Another Wrestling Death,

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , on December 6, 2009 by jemurr

It may be morbid to acknoweldge but a wrestler death is  a regular part of our news cycle now. We almost expect it. Test died earlier this year at 33, and yesterday Umaga died at 36. Details here

http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/news?slug=ys-wrestlerdeath120509&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

In the last few years a statistic floated around that 100 wrestlers died in the past decade that were under 50, and around 60-70 of them were under 40.  I’m almost 33, so Test was about my age, and Umaga was almost my age when he died.

To anyone my age reading this, this includes many wrestling stars we grew up with as a kid. Junkyard dog, Rick Rude, Big Bossman, Big John Studd, Miss Elizabeth, Earthquake, Bam Bam Bigelow, Dino Bravo, Sensational Sherri, Davey Boy Smith, Crush, Hercules, Road Warrior Hawk, Mr Perfect, Yokuzuna, Saphire, Texas Tornado, and on and on.

I couldn’t find a solid list with all the deaths AND when they happened AND how old they were, but decent one I found is here.

http://www.pwwew.net/people/dead.htm

I can’t help but wonder is it wrong to just not like wrestling anymore? That might be unfair but you don’t see as many fatalities in football, any fightning sport, or racing.

The only comparable thing the comes to mind is rock n roll deaths. Many young rock stars died from accidents, murder, and drug related deaths. That list would include Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison, John Bonham, Bon Scott, John Lennon, Randy Rhoads, Cliff Burton, Eric Carr, Kurt Kobain, Michael Jakson, and many more. (If you’re curious, look here

http://www.biblebelievers.com/RockDeaths.html )

Even still, I don’t think you have so many young rock n roll deaths in such a short period of time.

What is it about wrestling that has lost so many young active people this past 10-12 years? Drugs, steriods, the grueling touring schedule? Bret Hart said he would have liked to have been home just one Christmas for his kids. If a wrestling event ever comes near my home on Christmas day, I will not go. Sometimes I’m not sure if I’d go period.

What do you think?

The Time Traveller’s Wife

Posted in Movie Reviews with tags on November 19, 2009 by jemurr

The premise is interesting. Henry, a man with a genetic disorder randomely travels through time for brief periods, before returning to his present. Naturally this complicates relationships which is what the story is about.

Henry has no control over his time traveling. Usually he’s only gone for a few minutes, but when he arrives he’s naked, as clothes don’t travel through time. Hence he always has to run and find clothes, getting into precarious situations along the way. Since the trips are so brief why couldn’t he have just stayed put a few times? (Also this could have fed the vanishing Hitchhiker urban legend but never did)

When he meets his wife Clare for the first time (for him) she’s already totally in love with him, as an older version of him visited her as a child many times in the past. It’s interesting but not executed well, and comes off as awkward and even laughable, as she pretty much throws herself at him. Never mind the awful subtext you can read into a naked man in the woods talking to a pre-teen girl.

Anyway they marry and have struggles with their relationship, bearing children, and hints of an impending death. One funny part is when he disappears on his wedding day, and an older Henry ends up going through the ceremony.

As much as Clare gushes over Henry, I didn’t have as much of a sense that Henry loved her back. There were some inconsistencies in it’s internal logic and the dialogue told us things that we should have just seen. A friend finds out Henry’s secret, which has no bearing on the plot. Great premise, poor execution. Might be the worst I saw this year, at least the most disappointing. 6/10

2012 Movie Review

Posted in Movie Reviews with tags on November 12, 2009 by jemurr

Well in about two years it will be time for the world to end again, and Hollywood gave us a preview with the latest film simply called, 2012. It actually begins in 2009, and then goes into the far off future of 2010, showing us some scientific discoveries warning of the coming disaster. In short the biggest solar flare ever is microwaving Earth causing the core to heat up super-fast, which isn’t good apparently. This is discovered by this scientist guy named Adrian who works for the US government.

The Mayan phenomenon (of their calendar ending of 12/21/2012) is mentioned only in passing. A flash animation on the blog of Charlie the conspiracy nut sort of explains some geology theory from 1950 something, that supposedly Einstein agreed with. It’s better explained throughout the film as it’s actually happening. Charlie also mentions that other cultures like the Hopi’s predicted this as well.

While viewing this it seemed unclear if the disasters actually started on 12/21, but I assume it did. Much of the movie took place in the western US where there wouldn’t be snow, but one scene in Washington does have snow.

Anyway the disaster scenes look absolutely fantastic. It’s just beautiful watching the destruction. One laugh out loud moment is a subway car flying out of the ground. There’s lots of close calls and narrow escapes, but if that bothers you what are you doing watching a disaster movie in the first place?

What’s interesting is the sort of conspiracy subplot. The worlds governments knew this was coming years before and secretly made some preparations. Famous art like the Mona Lisa was secretly replaced (and saved) and people were killed who threatened to blow the whistle.  The rich had the option to buy their survival at 1 Billion Euros a head, which I assume is more than USD since it’s emphasized to be Euros a few times.  Anyway this brings up the societal dilemma that realistically everyone couldn’t be saved, so what should be done. Good stuff.

In the midst of all this is our man on the street character Jackson Curtis, a divorced limo driver and small time author. He stumbles onto the secret and saves his two kids, his ex, and her man who’s a boob surgeon. Most of the story centers on them. There’s also a rich Russian dude I really liked.

Danny Glover plays the US President. I like him, but not in this, he’s too sorrowful the whole time, no presence of leadership. Charlie the conspiracy guy is way over the top, but he does his job I guess.  Another laugh out loud  moment is watching an actor play Governor Ah-Nuld. Like many Schwarzenegger flicks, it’s so bad it’s good. The end had that something I can’t place that needed to be more suspenseful.

I wasn’t expecting much from this, considering it came from the people that made Independence Day, which I hated. Not to mention other bores like the American Godzilla, 10,000 BC, and that other much less interesting disaster movie The Day After Tomorrow. Surprisingly this was actually pretty good. I liked the characters and some decent emotion was thrown in. What I hated about movies like ID4 was they were all FX and nothing else.  Here the FX were absolutely amazing, and it worked to tell a decent story.

Between this and Korea’s Haeundae movie, it’s been a good year for disasters.

8/10

Sgt Rock Film, In the FUTURE: You gotta be kidding me.

Posted in Comic Books with tags , , on November 11, 2009 by jemurr

       I’m not prone to fanboy rage these days, but I gotta call this one.

It’s been announced here http://www.heatvisionblog.com/2009/11/sgt-rock-francis-lawrence-akiva-goldsman-joel-silver.html that a Sgt Rock movie is in the works. Sgt. Rock is a DC comics character who fights Nazi baddies in WWII. He’s one of the great characters of war comics. Sounds like it’d make a good movie right, except it’s going to be set in the future.

           Yeah………………

       Really, I mean why even bother? Why not make a Superman movie where he’s a wizard, or a movie where Batman is a swamp monster. How about a Green Lantern movie starring Jack Black or a Catwoman movie where she gets powers from ancient Egypt… oh right.

           The article further states..

““Inglourious Basterds” notwithstanding, period war movies have not been in vogue in Hollywood for years, unless it was a more serious contemplation of the subject like “Saving Private Ryan.” Also, American jingoism went out of style after 9/11; even this summer’s G.I. Joe movie dropped the toy’s “A Real American Hero” tagline and made the action team internationally focused.

The studio hopes moving the time period to the future solves the dilemma.”

 

                      Whatever. It’s almost scripture now that when a movie respects it’s comic source material it does well. Regarding WWII, Isn’t Marvel making a Captain America movie set in WWII? Besides that we have endless reminders of movies being successful because they’re good, not because they’re trendy.

           So this is what DC entertainment is up too, and to think I got my hopes up. With any luck maybe after a few blunders like this Warner Brothers will just tap out and sell DC to Disney, putting Marvel and DC under the same roof.

Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2 Review

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , on October 27, 2009 by jemurr

I’m only a casual video game player nowadays, so I’m excited to write a game review. Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2 adapts the Secret Wars and Civil War story arc, from writers Brian Michael Bendis and Mark Miller.

The action starts immediately and in the first level you’re on a secret mission in Latveria with Nick Fury, who fights along side you. Dr. Doom, Latveria’s usual leader, died at the events of last game, but you run afoul of it’s new leader. The next level features the repercussions of that, followed by the Civil War story.

The Civil War comic story is that a team of young superheroes is fighting some villains, and massive human casualties, including children, result. The government passes a law saying all heroes must register with the government or be arrested. Tony Stark leads the charge for registration, and Captain America leads a force against it. Basically a superhero civil war occurs, with some villains getting into the mix as well.

At this part of the game you choose which side to be on, the pro or anti-registration sides. Each side has a few exclusive heroes and has it’s own story. However both sides have the same final levels, The ending in a way is better, or at least makes more sense, that the actual comic.

Once you beat one side you can play on the other, but you have to start from the very beginning. I played the pro-reg side first, thinking it would be easier. I was disappointed to see the anti-side was almost the same story anyway. The levels we’re about the same, in both sides for example, you fight against a giant character. (Goliath for pro, Yellowjacket for anti) Plus upon beating it you can play as any character the second time around. Meaning Iron Man can fight on the anti-reg side against Iron Man. This made for some interesting screen shots. I was also disappointed that only two villains, (not counting Deadpool) Green Goblin and Venom, were playable. I would have liked Bullseye or Taskmaster or several others. The Punisher is sadly absent, though he is mentioned. As in MAU1, Nick Fury is playable once you beat it. There’s more about him but I’d have to ruin the story.

While I’ve been out of touch with video games I’ve heard through the grape vine that, while games are much more expansive these days, they just aren’t as hard as they used to be. This is for a number of reasons. I have to say MAU2 is harder than its predecessor. First time through I played on the hardest level, during which most of the henchmen we’re easy, (Except the last two levels) but some of the bosses were tough. Upon beating the hardest mode a legendary mode is unlocked, which is pretty difficult all around. The Fusion powers are really cool and you really need them. MAU1 was pretty easy, but it did have a few bosses where you really had to figure out what to do, as opposed to just straight combat. While MAU2 was harder I did miss this component. Also the final boss wasn’t really that hard.

The game play is about the same as the first. You can save and switch characters from any point so that’s cool. I think the use of characters is balanced out better. In MAU1 I unlocked Daredevil while in Asgard. Cool, but what good is Daredevil against Frost Giants and Loki? In this game you mostly fight soldiers and robots, so all characters are useful. Like the first one Thor, Iron Man, and Wolverine are really good. Cap seems a little worse. Deadpool is fantastic to use, and is so funny. Stan Lee’s cameo is fantastic. Unique conversations are back and each conversation has an Aggressive, Diplomatic, and Defensive response. They don’t change the game but give little tidbits of info and bonuses are given for each attitude. Team bonuses are present but there didn’t seem to be as many named teams this time.

Most of what I didn’t like, besides what I’d mentioned, are little things. MAU1 had tons of extra costumes, that’s good. But using each costume was almost like a new character, as it had its own stats to build. That’s bad. MAU2 was not like this, that’s good. But each character only had one extra costume, that’s bad. (You got Spidey’s Armor costume too.) Nick Fury however did not seem to have a second costume……. that’s bad. Simulator discs were present but were more training exercises than actual missions fighting other villains like the first game. They did seem easier too, but I’d say that’s bad. (MAU1 discs were REALLY hard though) There was also hidden art which I didn’t care for. Adding to the story were audio discs where you’d hear conversations or news-reports advancing the story. These were at such random places though, video game logic aside it didn’t make sense. They should have been at the bases or something like that. The trivia game returned. MAU1 had lots of expository dialogue to help you. This game had hidden files that you had to read. Forget I’m a teacher for a moment and let me say who wants to read files in a video game!?!

 Many years ago I thought how cool would it be to have a Marvel comics video game, with tons of playable characters and levels all over the Marvel Universe. That was MAU1. The sequel’s goal was to adapt a specific story, which it did well. Most of the game you play in America, esp NYC. Other places you go are Latveria, the Negative Zone, and the fictitious African nation of Wakanda. MAU2 is fun to play and harder, but has small disappointments and I didn’t like how it played out the second time around. Due to that I’d give it somewhere in the 70s on a scale of 1-100.

I do hope they keep the two sides formula for future installments. Marvels Secret Invasion and Dark Reign storylines would fit well into that, but you should definitely be able to play as more villains. Until then. Make Mine Marvel!

Consumer Fiction: Marvel DC movie worlds.

Posted in Consumer Fiction with tags , , on October 24, 2009 by jemurr

Fan Fiction, stories about licensed characters written by fans, have exploded since the internet. What I’m about to write is what I call consumer fiction, not stories necessarily, but what if scenarios imagining certain products coming out.

I’ve written a lot about the Marvel movie universe and DC’s lack thereof. What if DC had started a film universe that went head to head with Marvel’s. It’d be the comic book equivalent to wrestling’s Monday Night Wars.

Year One

Superman

This would basically be Superman Begins. Rebooting the Superman franchise for a new generation, but like the 1978 movie, show lots of Krypton, young Clark, and then have him fight Lex Luthor.

Captain America.

World War II period piece, maybe hinting at, if not showing other heroes of the era. Fights Nazi baddies, Red Skull, ends with his apparent death.

I picked Cap for the first Marvel movie so this year we’d see with the beginning of the Marvel and DC universes.

Year Two

Batman Begins

This could almost be the same movie as what we have. Post credit scene where Superman flies to Wayne Manor, saying they need to talk.

Iron Man

Again could be just about the same movie.

Aquaman.

This could be a good underwater fantasy flick. Post credit scene, a cruise ship rides by, turns out to be Bruce Wayne’s. He makes contact with Aquaman, hints about team.

Year Three

Wonder Woman.

Maybe no WWII references. I’m thinking it all takes place on Paradise island, but perhaps no. Superman appears post credit.

Thor

Continuing the fantasy theme.  Takes place mostly on Asgard.

Green Lantern. Post credit scene with a few heroes.

Year Four

Superman 2. Leads into JLA movie.

Hulk

Justice League,  starring all previous DC characters of course. I’d love to see Darkseid as the big baddie, with hints of him dropped in previous movies.

Avengers.

I’ve always been a Marvel fan, but I think if you look at the core Avengers characters vs JLA, not as many Avengers characters could carry their own movies. That could definitely give DC a box office edge as they’d have more movies to work from. DC COULD HAVE gone toe to toe with Marvel on this, and just might have come out on top. DC Entertainment was announced last month, in an attempt to further capitalize on DC properties,  but is it too late? We’re talking about a company that almost had Jack Black play Green Lantern, so who knows.

Anyway, what do you think.

The Shocking Truth About Alien Abductions

Posted in Paranormal with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 21, 2009 by jemurr

As soon as the 90s started, conspiracy was all the rage. It arguably began in 1991 with Oliver Stone’s JFK, about the alleged conspiracy to kill Kennedy. That same year, the TV show Sightings featured “investigative reports” on paranormal activity. Two years later was The X-Files, the TV Drama that ran through the decade, about alien abductions and government conspiracies.

UFO and abduction tales were nothing new, Whitley Streiber published his encounters with big eyed creatures in 1987’s Communion. The first book about Roswell, the great UFO story of our day, came out in 1980. By the 90s the phenomenon was in fool force.  Books were published, and daytime talkshows were filled with alleged abductees, not just your fly by night hosts either. I remember none other that Oprah Winfrey had an episode about it, complete with an author who studied the phenomenon, and concluded it was real. As a kid these stories freaked me out. At night I’d wonder if big eyed creatures would come in my room and anal probe me!

A few years back I noticed the phenomeon sort of went away, from the mainstream anyway. I wondered what that said for it’s validity. Since the 90s I learned that in the 1950s there was a contactee fad. People claimed they rode UFO’s to Venus and stuff like that, sounds silly looking back on it.

Anyway I just finished “The Abduction Enigma: The Truth Behind the Mass Alien Abductions of the Late Twentieth Century.” It was written by Kevin D. Randle, Russ Estes, and William P. Cone, Ph.D, and published in 1999, interestingly enough.

Without rehasing the entire book let me sum up the main points. Abduction tales are like modern day folklore, stories that evolve and change over time, but are spread faster than older folklore due to the mass media. Stories similar to alien abduction can be found in history involving mythological monsters, demons, witches, and fairies. (Of course Streiber notes fairies himself in Communion, hinting it could have been aliens all along).

In the last century science fiction stories have fed us with big eyed alien abduction stories, several movies are noted. If you look at the early abduction tales like Betty and Barney Hill, the descriptions of the aliens don’t totally match the “Greys” we know today. Their appearance has evolved, if you will.

We also know from harrowing child abuse cases that repressed memories are not reliable, niether are hypnosis techniques used to recover them. (Hypnosis is more reliable for relaxation and treatment for addiction) More unsettling is that abduction stories can be fed to a patient by the therapist, through the use of leading questions. (Similar to how alleged psychics do ”Cold Readings.”) More reinforcement comes from paranormal media and UFO support groups. Sleep paralysis also plays a role in not being able to move and seeing strange things in your room.

The authors do not suggest therapists deliberately trick patients, but that sometimes in the mental health field people are desperate to find answers to help their sick patients. So they unintentionally give in to the latest pop psych trend.

There’s no physical evidence of abductions. Abductee claims of implants are just scar tissue and things like that. Small scars/marks on the body are not conclusive. We all can find strange marks on our body if we really look.

Finally, a logical look at the general abduction tale. Creatures who have mastered interstellar travel abduct humans to repeatedly do the same experiments, and erase memories of the experience. Yet primitive mankind today can do tons of genetic research with but a few small genetic samples, and a weekend course in hypnotherapy can un-erase abduction memories. Also, many abductions have a high sexual component, which is often under-reported. Why would aliens abduct women, implant them with an alien fetus, and send them back to earth where they could fall down the steps or get hit by a car and die and lose the fetus. Why not take a man to bang a hot alien chic. Greys, you know where I live.

(Consequently a true laugh out loud moment is on page 97.

As she lay there, immobile on the table, one of the five foot aliens mounted her, looked deep in her eyes, and what she heard him say was, “What you need is a good f#*k!”)

Though very interesting the book isn’t put together well. There’s a few grammar/spelling mistakes, and after presenting all the arguments, gives us 100 pages plus detailing individual UFO researchers and why they’re wrong. I found that tedious. There’s also a strong lead in early on to Satanic Ritual Abuse, an extremely similar phenomenon, but it’s not followed up on until later. Most confusing is the introduction, where two of the three authors say they do in fact believe in the phenomenon. Estes says on p 18, “If asked the question, do I believe in alien contact? I would respond with a simple “Yes.”"

Randle follows up on p22, “I  believe that UFO’s represent, in rare cases, alien visitation…I believe, based on some very compelling evidence, and on some testimony from some very credible sources, that there has been extraterrestrial visitation.”

That confused the greys out of me. I re-read it several times, second guessing myself, but that’s what it says.

When I was real little there was this Buick commercial where a big bird would screech on the screen. I remember a dream I had as a young child where I was laying in my bed at night, and I heard “Jimmy.” I looked up and saw the Buick bird looking at me, and it screeched “Raaahhh.” If the wrong person got a hold of me at the time, they might have convinced my mom I’d been molested. Ten years later they might have convinced me that my dream was a screen for a memory of alien abduction. In it’s own way, either outcome is scarier than what may lurk in the night sky.

Story: And the myth of Art vs Hollywood.

Posted in Movie Reviews with tags , , on October 13, 2009 by jemurr

Do you grow weary of “typical Hollywood endings?” Do you crave the “art” films in all there indy/eccentric non-english glory? Are you, like Alan Moore, bemoaning the death of imagination? (See my blog on Death of Imagination) Not so fast, says, Robert Mckee, author of Story.

Story is one of the most acclaimed entries among countless books on how to write screenplay. I won’t be talking about his screenplay advice, but will address his theories on Story in modern society.

Mckee points out what most of us know, but maybe never thought of. Every year Hollywood makes over 400 films,  and buys thousands and thousands of scripts that will never be made. During the 1990 s, Hollywood spent $500 million dollars a year on script development. 3/4s of that were for movies we never saw.  (McKee 13) As much as critics hated Transformers 2, for the most part there are no better movies than those produced. “The hard to believe truth is that what we see on the screen each year is  a reasonable reflection of the best writing of the past few years.” (14)

As far as Hollywood” vs “art” films are concerned, consider this. The Fisher King, Blue Velvet, JFK, Dangerous Liasons, and Do the Right Thing are all succesful “Hollywood” movies. 1988’s, The Accidental Tourist made 250 million world wide, more than most action flicks at the time. (2008’s Benjamin Button made 332 million, which was more than say, John Rambo)What the artsy snob calls “Hollywood films” are the 30 some FX movies, usually released in the summer. These are far less than half the films that come out each year. (39)

The “Art Film” typically means non-hollywood, often narrowed to do foreign, and more specifically European. This of course does not include gory Italian horror/action films or hardcore German pornography, but rather the few good European films that are shown stateside. (39)

Finally he addresses a cliche we all know, you have to learn the rules before you break them.  It’s ok to want to make something “avant garde,” but before first master the basic craft or else the results are just a bunch of weird stuff. Eccentricness is not creativity, it’s just odd.

That’s all I’ll cover, but he has many fine points on screenwriting.  I included myself among the cultural snobs once, but as I become a grumpy old man I see their pretentiousness. Plus some of them are just weird, and that’s something coming from me.

It was easy to be a snob 10-15 years ago. The blockbuster type movies of my college days were terrible; Batman and Robin, Independence Day, Armageddon, Fifth Element, etc.  My last semester I flocked to the downtown theater that started showing indy-flicks, and I saw some real good stuff like Bufallo 66 and Smoke Signals. (They also showed Pi, but I saw that later) Of course it didn’t last, being it was a small town and all. But anyway most blockbuster type movies nowadays are actually good, Iron Man and The Dark Knight for example.

Anyway to our art snobs, stop whining about Hollywood, get your nose out of the air and get cracking on the craft.

Good writing

What Really Pisses Me Off About Wrestling.

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on September 22, 2009 by jemurr

This year I found myself on a Nitro kick. In 1995, WCW Monday Night Nitro aired on TNT, going head to head against WWF Raw on USA. This led to what many feel was the greatest era in wrestling history, the Monday Night Wars.

Unfortunately, I totally missed out on it, having sworn off wrestling maybe 4 years prior. Years later I’d heard about how special this time was, the NWO, Hogan as a villain, the Montreal Screwjob, Austin 3:16, wrestlers switching from one brand to the next, and in the midst of all that was ECW.

Anyway thanks to sites like youtube we can re-live these glory days, or see them for the first time. I found the first few months of Nitro available online and watched for a bit. Even pre-NWO (when Hogan was still a hero) was still pretty entertaining. One day I saw something that truly caught my eye. Check this out.

What did we just see! A great tag team W OMEN’S match. It was fast paced, back and forth, exciting and unique. Did you see the move at 5:16? Not to mention the other airborne moves and such.

Now, if you can bare it, watch this.

Now look I’m a guy ok. I like looking at hot chicks and bikini babes and all that but give me a break. I bet there’s a lot of other heterosexual male wrestling fans that feel the same way.  It’s a shame to watch that WCW match and see the direction WWE took women’s wrestling. Oh well.

P.S. The Japanese wrestlers were Bull Nakano and Akira Hokuto, who defeated Mayumi Ozaki, Cutie Suzuki.

DC Entertainment: Thinking out loud…

Posted in Comic Books with tags , , , , , on September 12, 2009 by jemurr

A week after the Disney Marvel news, Warner Brothers announced DC Entertainment, a corporate restructuring for the purpose of bringing DC characters across multimedia platforms.  The head of DC entertainment is Diane Nelson, who oversaw the Harry Potter franchise.

Naturally numerous questions abounded, such as will we finally see a Wonder Woman movie? Will there be a Superman reboot? Will we finally see a JLA movie/shared universe to compete with the Marvel movie universe/Avengers movie?

My question is why wasn’t this done 10, 20, or even 30 years ago? The first Superman movie in 1978 was a gamble. No comic book movie had been a smash hit before. Once it did hit big, why did they not follow up with a Batman movie? (Tim Burton’s Batman came over ten years later, (89) and by that time the Superman film series died a horrible death) Plus, the late 70s-early 80s was the Star Wars era, so why not throw a Green Lantern movie into the mix? In the early 80s, fantasy hit big with Arnold’s movie Conan the Barbarian. A Wonder Woman movie anyone? It all could have tied together and we could have had a JLA movie by 1986. Comic books greatest year indeed.

But it didn’t happen, oh well. Maybe it can finally happen now. DC, and Warner Brother specifically, if they want it bad enough, can still go toe to toe with the Marvel Movie universe. Here’s to hoping it happens.

More about DC entertainment can be read here.

http://www.newsarama.com/comics/090909-DC-Restructuring.html